Apply These 5 Secret Techniques To Improve CAR ACCIDENT DEATH

A Guardian column provides described more measures that are being taken up to combat deaths from car accidents all over Europe.

The article argues that, whatever measures are implemented by governments and security campaigners, the only people who can make a genuine difference to road safety are motorists themselves. The roads are a location of great personal responsibility, but many people do not appear to take that duty of treatment towards other drivers seriously sufficiently.

Too many fall into the trap, literally, to be caught speeding, for which a plethora of excuses are offered. Everybody knows the profile of the stereotypical speeder: the young male driver who’s either trying to impress his friends or a girl, or driving too quickly simply because he enjoys the feeling of it.

This does not paint the entire picture. A bit in the Telegraph just lately described speeding as a ‘pretty middle income activity’, perpetrated by people in their 40s or 50s who believe that when they generate at 40mph in built-up areas, it is somehow not as bad as when a young man or woman does it. Outgoing Cambridgeshire Police Chief Constable Julie Spence spoke of the ‘hypocrisy’ of middle-class speeders.

“People think they must be able to get away with it. They wouldn’t tolerate lawbreaking by someone else but they take action themselves without thinking.

“It all seems OK until something tragic occurs, like their child dies because of a car crash.”

This was backed up by the Conservative broadcaster Ian Dale, who was simply obliged to attend a road safety awareness course after being caught generating at 37mph in a 30mph zone. Initially he was skeptical about it, fearing that he was being made an example of, and joining the ranks of several drivers who wail that they are a ‘soft’ target for the police, becoming exploited to rake in around GBP100 million every year for the government.

However, after the lessons itself was finished, his viewpoint shifted. The woman who was simply running the training course explained that she had in no way once exceeded the speed restriction, and all because her child had been struck by a driver doing 37mph in a 30 zone, exactly like Mr Dale, and she has been still dealing with her injuries five years in the future. This produced him reconsider his actions.

He also described the other attendees of the course as being round the same age as him (he could be 48), rather than the ‘boy racers’ he has been expecting, reinforcing what Ms Spence explained.

Anyone who has experienced an accident will know the sensation of intense concern that accompanies as soon as before impact, once the car is out of control and you also are nothing but a passenger even though you are gripping the steering wheel. Ideally, if all drivers could experience that experience without causing injury to themselves or other people, then many road deaths will be avoided.

Hypothetically, perhaps if knowledge and awareness aren’t working well enough, speed-limiting technology could possibly be used to physically stop the automobile from breaking the speed limitation. Opponents would doubtless argue that this would inhibit them from generating quickly if they needed to, such can be an emergency. This can be a valid argument, but an empty one. If the sponsor of Ian Dale’s speeding course can manage it, then hence can the others of Britain’s motorists.

Obviously you can find reasons against driving too slowly and gradually aswell: excessively slothful motoring causes more problems than it solves. It is all about striking a balance and making folks realise that being given a driving a vehicle license gives them the proper to share the street with the UK’s 25 million other motorists, not necessarily treat them as some sort of racetrack.

Tags: No tags

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *